Wiki syntaxes

Print statements get old. Our target syntax will need to elegantly represent both content and logic. Content and logic, IMO, are tied too greatly in a text-adventure to blindly separate them.
Dynamic replacement for localization or non-priviledged editing, sure, but a meaningful and hopefully accurate content example should exist inline with the logic.

Yet another DSL, although perhaps we can borrow an existing syntax from the wiki folks.

Annoying - none of the [[[source editors]] support a wiki syntax! Well, we would have needed to embed it inside the highligher for CoffeeScript anyway, enabling it on multiline strings.



Bidirectional conversion between HTML and wiki markup. Small JS lib.

Designed for extensibility, pipeline mods. One-way, I think.